Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Comparing phacoemulsification and phacotrabeculectomy for managing primary angle-closure glaucoma with cataracts: a review

  • Putri Anya Universade ,
  • Evelyn Komaratih ,
  • Citrawati Dyah Kencono W ,


Link of Video Abstract:


Cataracts and glaucoma are two leading causes of global blindness that are often found together, creating complex clinical challenges. Cataracts, which cause visual impairment by covering the eye's lens, and glaucoma, characterized by increased intraocular pressure and damage to the optic nerve, are mainly related to age and lens size. Mixed case management is becoming increasingly important in ophthalmic practice.

Choosing the right surgical technique is the key to overcoming both. This decision requires consideration of long-term effectiveness, benefits, and risk of complications. One technique that has emerged is phacotrabeculectomy, but the decision to choose this surgical technique is not easy because it requires considering various factors.

Further research and a better understanding of the management of this eye disease will be crucial in improving patients' quality of life and well-being. With the prevalence of cataracts and glaucoma continuing to increase as the population ages, an emphasis on effective and sustainable management strategies will significantly impact society's overall eye health. This review will compare phacoemulsification and phacotrabeculectomy for managing primary angle-closure glaucoma with cataracts.


  1. Kingman S. Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2004; 82(11): 887–888
  2. Oye JE, Kuper H. Prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in Limbe urban area, South West Province, Cameroon. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(11):1435-1439. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.115840
  3. Wu SY, Hennis A, Nemesure B, and Leske MC. Impact of Glaucoma, Lens Opacities, and Cataract Surgery on Visual Functioning and Related Quality of Life: The Barbados Eye Studies. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2008l 49(4): 1333. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1252
  4. Zhang N, Wang J, Chen B, Li Y, Jiang B. Prevalence of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma in the Last 20 Years: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;7:624179. Published 2021 Jan 18. doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.624179
  5. Mansori M, Ramezani F, and Moghimi S. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography parameters in phacomorphic angle closure and mature cataract risk factors in phacomorphic angle closure. IVOS. 2014; 55: 7403–7409.
  6. Napier, M.L., and Azuara-Blanco, A. 2018. Changing patterns in treatment of angle closure glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology; 29, 130–134.
  7. Poley,B.J, Lindstrom, R.L., Samuelson, T.W, and Schulze, R. Jr. 2009. Intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes: evaluation of a causal relationship between the natural lens and open-angle glaucoma. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2009;35(11):1946-55
  8. Kolb, H., 2007. Gross Anatomy of the Eye - Webvision - NCBI Bookshelf [WWW Document]. Gross Anatomy of the Eye - Webvision - NCBI Bookshelf. URL
  9. Bowling, B., Kanski, J.J., 2016. Kanski’s Clinical Ophthalmology, A Systematic Approach. Kanski’s Clinical Ophthalmology, A Systematic Approach
  10. Iribarren, R. 2015. Crystalline lens and refractive development. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research; 47, 86–106. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.02.002
  11. Ramakrishan, R. et al. 2013. Diagnosis and management of glaucoma. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical
  12. Mirzaie M, Bahremani E, Taheri N, Khamnian Z, Kharrazi Ghadim B. Cataract Grading in Pure Senile Cataracts: Pentacam versus LOCS III. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2022;17(3):337-343. Published 2022 Aug 15. doi:10.18502/jovr.v17i3.11570
  13. Burrato, L., Werner, L., Zaini, M., and Apple, D., 2003. Phacoemulsification Principles and Techniques. Secon Edition. Thorofare: Slaci incorporated, 2003
  14. Allingham RR, Sayoko MM, Bruce SK. Shields' Textbook of Glaucoma. Wolters Kluwer Health. 2020
  15. Sakata L.M., Lavanya. R., and Aung.T. 2008. Comparison of gonioscopy and anterior segment ocular coherence tomography in detecting angle-closure in different quadrants of the anterior chamber angle. Ophthalmology 2008;115:769-74
  16. Musch, D. C. 2018. Cataract extraction in the collaborative initial glaucomatreatment study: incidence, risk factors, and the effect of cataract progression and extraction on clinical and quality-of-life outcomes: Incidence, risk factors, and the effect of cataract progression and extraction on clinical and quality-of-life outcomes,” Archives of ophthalmology, 124(12), pp. 1694–1700. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.12.1694
  17. Leske, M. C.2003. Factors for Glaucoma Progression and the Effect of Treatment. Archives of Ophthalmology, 121(1), 48.doi:10.1001/archopht.121.1.48
  18. Trikha, S., Perera, S. A., Husain, R., Aung, T.2015. The role of lens extraction in the current management of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 26(2), 128–134.doi:10.1097/icu.0000000000000128
  19. Fontana, H. J. 2010. Procedural Treatments: Phacotrabeculectomy in Pearls of Glaucoma Management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 317– 321
  20. Kim, W. S., and Kim, K. H. 2016. Cataract surgery in glaucoma patients, in Challenges in Cataract Surgery. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 23–32
  21. Moghimi, S., Hashemian, H., Chen, R., Johari, M., Mohammadi, M., and Lin, S. C. 2015. Early phacoemulsification in patients with acute primary angle closure. Journal of Current Ophthalmology, 27(3-4), 70–75.doi:10.1016/j.joco.2015.12.001
  22. Tham CC, Kwong YY, Leung DY, et al. Phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy in medically controlled chronic angle closure glaucoma with cataract. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(12):2167-2173.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.06.016
  23. Hayashi, K., Hayashi, H., Nakao, F., and Hayashi, F. 2000. Changes in anterior chamber angle width and depth after intraocular lens implantation in eyes with glaucoma. Ophthalmology, 107(4), 698–703.doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00007-5
  24. Pereira, F. A. S., and Cronemberger, S. 2003. Ultrasound biomicroscopic study of anterior segment changes after phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology, 110(9), pp. 1799–1806. doi: 10.1016/S0161- 6420(03)00623-7
  25. Shams, P. N. and Foster, P. J. 2012. Clinical outcomes after lens extraction for visually significant cataract in eyes with primary angle closure. Journal of glaucoma, 21(8),pp. 545–550. doi: 10.1097/ijg.0b013e31821db1db
  26. Bhallil, S., Andalloussi, I., and Chraibi, F. 2009. Changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal phacoemulsification in normal patients. Oman J Ophthalmol; 2, 111.
  27. Wang F, Wu ZH. Phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy in the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma with cataract: a Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(4):597-603. Published 2016 Apr 18. doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.04.21
  28. Obuchowska, I., and Mariak, Z. 2005. Risk factors of massive suprachoroidal hemorrhageduring extracapsular cataract extraction surgery. European journal of ophthalmology, 15(6), pp. 712–717. doi: 10.1177/112067210501500609
  29. Kubota, T., Toguri, I., Onizuka, N., & Matsuura, T. 2003. Phacoemulsification and Intraocular Lens Implantation for Angle Closure Glaucoma after the Relief of Pupillary Block. Ophthalmologica, 217(5), 325–328.doi:10.1159/000071346
  30. Ezra, D. G., Nambiar, A., and Allan, B. D. 2008. Supplementary Intracameral Lidocaine for Phacoemulsification under Topical Anesthesia. Ophthalmology, 115(3), 455– 487.doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.09
  31. Sharma, T. K., Nessim, M., Kyprianou, I., Kumar, V., Shah, P., and O’Neil, E. 2008. Vitreous loss during phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients: Long-term intraocular pressure control. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 34(5), 831–834.doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.031
  32. Henderson, B. A., Kim, J. Y., Ament, C. S., Ferrufino-Ponce, Z. K., Grabowska, A., and Cremers, S. L. 2007. Clinical pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 33(9), 1550–1558.doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.013
  33. Krömer, M., Nölle, B., and Rüfer, F. 2021. Laser Suture Lysis After Trabeculectomy With Mitomycin C. Journal of Glaucoma, 24(5), e84– e87.doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000000144
  34. Jiang, L., Eaves, S., Dhillon, N., and Ranjit, P.2018. Postoperative outcomes following trabeculectomy and nonpenetrating surgical procedures: a 5-year longitudinal study. Clinical Ophthalmology, Volume 12, 995–1002.doi:10.2147/opth.s163247
  35. Chan, P.P., Li, E., Tsoi, K.K.F., Kwong, Y.Y., and Tham, C.C. 2018. Cost-effectiveness of phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy for treating primary angle closure glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma . doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000772
  36. Elsa Gustianty, Novaqua Yandi, R. Maula Rifada, Andika Prahasta. Successful rate of glaucoma surgery in uveitis glaucoma. Bali Med J. [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 19 [cited 2023 Sep. 29];11(2):614-8. Available from:
  37. Wetarini K, Dewi NMRP, Mahayani NMW. Acute angle closure glaucoma: management in acute attack setting. Bali Med J. [Internet]. 2020 Apr. 1 [cited 2023 Sep. 29];9(1):386-9. Available from:
  38. Siska S, Memed FK, Musa IR. Factors influence bullous keratopathy post cataract surgery at National Eye Center of Cicendo Eye Hospital (PMN RSMC), West Java, Indonesia. Bali Med J. [Internet]. 2020 Nov. 1 [cited 2023 Sep. 29];9(3):840-3. Available from:

How to Cite

Universade, P. A., Komaratih, E. ., & Kencono W, C. D. . (2023). Comparing phacoemulsification and phacotrabeculectomy for managing primary angle-closure glaucoma with cataracts: a review. Bali Medical Journal, 12(3), 3001–3006.




Search Panel

Putri Anya Universade
Google Scholar
BMJ Journal

Evelyn Komaratih
Google Scholar
BMJ Journal

Citrawati Dyah Kencono W
Google Scholar
BMJ Journal