Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) between sevoflurane inhalation anesthetic and Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) in craniotomy surgery: a literature review

Abstract

Link of Video Abstract: https://youtu.be/KigXgHWz0JU

 

Background: The common neuroaesthetics used for neurosurgery was inhalation of Sevoflurane and the newest, by continuous infusion of propofol called Total Intravenous Anesthetic (TIVA). Anesthesia procedures are one of the biggest healthcare expenditures in hospitals. Thus, finding the most effective and efficient anesthetic technique but in the same time can maintain patient safety is important. This literature review compares a cost-effective Sevoflurane and propofol TIVA analysis in craniotomy surgery.

Methods: This literature review was carried out by searching studies in three online databases consisted of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar using the keywords "sevoflurane inhalation anesthetic", "propofol total intravenous anesthesia", "TIVA”, “craniotomy’, "cost-effective analysis", and “pharmacoeconomic”. Appropriate studies were then carried out through a narrative synthesis analysis.

Results: The assessment of cost-effective analysis in anesthesia is broadly divided into fixed commodities and various commodities. The analysis found the highest use of costs in the TIVA group and the lowest in the isoflurane inhalation group. The high cost in the TIVA group was caused by propofol being the most expensive compared to other inhalation agents such as isoflurane and Sevoflurane. Based on the average intraoperative anesthetic cost, it was also found that the anesthetic cost per patient was Rp. 957,870,- for the TIVA propofol group and Rp. 1,318,130,- for the sevoflurane group. Sevoflurane use for induction and maintenance of anesthesia resulted in a further modest decrease in costs (especially if fresh gas flow was reduced early), primarily through less drug waste.

Conclusion: The cost-effective analysis showed that Sevoflurane was less expensive than propofol. Yet, in terms of pharmacoeconomics, using TIVA propofol results in much fewer PONV episodes, unplanned hospital admissions, and patient lengths of stay, all of which improve pharmacoeconomic benefits.

References

  1. Vacas S, Van de Wiele B. Designing a pain management protocol for craniotomy: A narrative review and consideration of promising practices. Surg Neurol Int. 2017;8:291.
  2. Sneyd JR, Andrews CJH, Tsubokawa T. Comparison of propofol/remifentanil and sevoflurane/remifentanil for maintenance of anaesthesia for elective intracranial surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2005;94(6):778-783.
  3. Petersen KD, Landsfeldt U, Cold GE, Petersen CB, Mau S, Hauerberg J, et al. Intracranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamic in patients with cerebral tumors: A randomized prospective study of patients subjected to craniotomy in propofol-fentanyl, isoflurane-fentanyl, or sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(2):329–336.
  4. Schifilliti D, Grasso G, Conti A, Fodale V. Anaesthetic-related neuroprotection: intravenous or inhalational agents?. CNS drugs. 2010;24(11): 893-907.
  5. Prabhakar H, Singh GP, Mahajan C, Kapoor I, Kalaivani M, Anand V. Intravenous versus inhalational techniques for rapid emergence from anaesthesia in patients undergoing brain tumour surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9(9):CD010467.
  6. Preethi J, Bidkar PU, Cherian A, Dey A, Srinivasan S, Adinarayanan S, et al. Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia vs. inhalational anesthesia on brain relaxation, intracranial pressure, and hemodynamics in patients with acute subdural hematoma undergoing emergency craniotomy: a randomized control trial. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021;47(3):831-837.
  7. Smith I, Terhoeve PA, Hennart D, Feiss P, Harmer M, Pourriat JL, et al. A multicentre comparison of the costs of anaesthesia with Sevoflurane or propofol. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1999;83(4):564-570.
  8. Visser K, Hassink EA, Bonsel GJ, Moen J, Kalkman CJ. Randomized controlled trial of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane–nitrous oxide: postoperative nausea and vomiting and economic analysis. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2001;95(3):616-626.
  9. Hayu AL. Efektivitas Penggunaan General Anestesi Inhalasi High Flow Isoflurane, Low Flow Isoflurane dan Low Flow Sevoflurane Terhadap Perubahan Hemodinamik dan Biaya Obat Anestesi di GBPT RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya [Tesis]. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga. 2019.
  10. Wiles MD. Management of traumatic brain injury: a narrative review of current evidence. Anaesthesia. 2022;77 Suppl 1:102-112.
  11. Cole CD, Gottfried ON, Gupta DK, Couldwell WT. Total intravenous anesthesia: advantages for intracranial surgery. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(5 Suppl 2):369-378.
  12. Citerio G, Franzosi MG, Latini R, Masson S, Barlera S, Guzzetti S, et al. Anaesthesiological strategies in elective craniotomy: randomized, equivalence, open trial–The NeuroMorfeo trial. Trials. 2009;10:1-10.
  13. Iswahyudi, Sinardja K, Senapathi TGA. Analisis biaya periode intraoperatif anestesi intravena total propofol target controlled infusion (TCI) dengan anestesi inhalasi sevoflurane pada pasien operasi bedah mayor onkologi di RSUP Sanglah Tahun 2013 [Tesis]. Bagian Anestesiologi dan Terapi Intensif. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Udayana. 2013.
  14. Schüttler J, Ihmsen H. Population pharmacokinetics of propofol: a multicenter study. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(3):727-738.
  15. Bocskai T, Loibl C, Vamos Z, Woth G, Molnar T, Bogar L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of anesthesia maintained with Sevoflurane or propofol with and without additional monitoring: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. BMC anesthesiology. 2018;18(1):100.
  16. Luntz SP, Janitz E, Motsch J, Bach A, Martin E, Böttiger BW. Cost-effectiveness and high patient satisfaction in the elderly: sevoflurane versus propofol anaesthesia. European Journal Of Anaesthesiology. 2004;21(2):115-122.
  17. Lauta E, Abbinante C, Del Gaudio A, Aloj F, Fanelli M, De Vivo P, et al. Emergence times are similar with Sevoflurane and total intravenous anesthesia: results of a multicenter RCT of patients scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. 2010;22(2):110-118.
  18. Malhotra R, Kumar N, Jain A. Cost identification analysis of general anesthesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020;36(2):219-226.
  19. Zhou Z, Ying M, Zhao R. Efficacy and safety of Sevoflurane vs propofol in combination with remifentanil for anesthesia maintenance during craniotomy: a meta-analysis. Medicine. 2021;100(51):e28400.
  20. Kumar G, Stendall C, Mistry R, Gurusamy K, Walker DA comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol with Sevoflurane or desflurane in ambulatory surgery: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(10):1138-1150.
  21. Sentosa KW, Yehezkiel. Neurocritical care for traumatic brain injury in intensive care unit of Dr H. Andi Abdurahman Noor Hospital, Indonesia. Bali Medical Journal. 2019;8(1):134-137.
  22. Grazia CZ, Hanafie A, Nasution AH. Comparison of hemodynamic response between propofol and thiopental as an induction agent in neurosurgery anesthesia at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan-Indonesia. Bali Medical Journal. 2018;7(3):717-722.
  23. Senapathi TGA, Wiryanata M, Aribawa IGNM, Zundert AV, Labobar OA. Bonfils intubation fiberscope versus C-MAC videolaryngoscope: hemodynamic stability and incidence of sore throat in endotracheal intubated patients. Bali Medical Journal. 2017;6(2):247-250.

How to Cite

Rehi, P. D. D. (2023). Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) between sevoflurane inhalation anesthetic and Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) in craniotomy surgery: a literature review. Bali Medical Journal, 12(2), 1790–1795. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v12i2.4390

HTML
17

Total
13

Share

Search Panel

Petrus Devi Doko Rehi
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal