Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Factors influencing Bromage score in post-spinal anesthesia patients

  • pdf  |
  • Published: 2022-09-12

Abstract

Introduction: Bromage score is used in assessing patients post-spinal anesthesia while the patient is in the recovery room. Patients can be transferred to the treatment room from the recovery room if they have achieved a Bromage score of <2. Post-anesthesia recovery is significant to pay attention to because if there are obstacles in post-anesthesia recovery, it will cause some complications that the patient needs a long time in the treatment room. Several factors may be related to Bromage score, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status, age, gender, the dose of local anesthetic drugs, and other factors. 

Methods: This type of research Observational Analytics used secondary data with a cross-sectional study design with 327 participants. Data analysis using coefficient contingency correlation test. 

Results: The majority of 315 (96.6%) patients achieved a Bromage score of 1, with the highest number of patients aged (12-45 years). Patients with ASA physical status 1, a male and spinal anesthetic with a dose of Bupivacaine 10 mg – 15.5 mg achieved the most Bromage score 1. There was a significant relationship between gender and Bromage score in patients after spinal anesthesia, p-value = 0.048 (p-value < 0.05).

Conclusion: There is a significant relationship between sex and the Bromage score, and there is no significant relationship between ASA physical status, age, and local anesthetic dose with the Bromage score.

References

  1. Capdevila X, Aveline C, Delaunay L, et al. Factors Determining the Choice of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study. Adv Ther. 2020;37(1):527-540. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-01171-6.
  2. Imbelloni LE, Gouveia MA, Ghorayeb NM, Neto SVL. Spinal Anesthesia: Much More Than Single Shot of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine. Int J Anesthetic Anesthesiol. 2021;(8). p122. doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410122.
  3. Zeleke TG, Mersha AT, Endalew NS, Ferede YA. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Back Pain among Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, North West Ethiopia: An Institutional Based Cross-Sectional Study. Adv Med. 2021;2021:6654321. Published 2021 Jan 25. doi:10.1155/2021/6654321.
  4. Karnina R, Rahmadani S, Faruk M. Incidence of Hypotension, Bradycardia, and Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting with Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section Patient, Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2022. p1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9024.
  5. W.E. Fitria, S. Fatonah, P. Purwati, Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Bromage Score pada Pasien Spinal Anastesi di Ruang Pemulihan. J. Ilm. Keperawatan Sai Betik. 2019;(14). p182. https://doi.org/10.26630/jkep.v14i2.1304.
  6. Kaur M, Katyal S, Kathuria S, Singh P. A comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011;5(2):202-207. doi:10.4103/1658-354X.82804.
  7. Daabiss M. American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(2):111-115. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.79879.
  8. Li G, Walco JP, Mueller DA, Wanderer JP, Freundlich RE. Reliability of the ASA Physical Status Classification System in Predicting Surgical Morbidity: a Retrospective Analysis. Journal of Medical Systems. 2021 Jul;45(9):83. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01758-z. PMID: 34296341; PMCID: PMC8298361.
  9. Doyle DJ, Goyal A, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; May 3, 2022.
  10. Jatin P, Juhi J, Kalpesh P, and Kirti P. An Observational Study to Compare Patient and Surgeon Satisfaction and Hemodynamic Changes Occurring in Spinal Anaesthesia Versus General Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Surgery. Indian J. Forensic Med. Toxicol. 2021;(15). p309–318. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v15i3.15324.
  11. Craig D, Carli F. Bromage motor blockade score - a score that has lasted more than a lifetime. Can J Anaesth. 2018;65(7):837-838. doi:10.1007/s12630-018-1101-7.
  12. Singh A, Gupta A, Datta PK, Pandey M. Intrathecal levobupivacaine versus bupivacaine for inguinal hernia surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71(3):220-225. doi:10.4097/kja.d.18.27191.
  13. Hocevar LA, Fitzgerald BM. American Society of Anesthesiologists Staging. [Updated 2022 May 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549785/.
  14. Şahin AS, Türker G, Bekar A, Bilgin H, Korfalı G. A comparison of spinal anesthesia characteristics following intrathecal bupivacaine or levobupivacaine in lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(3):695-700. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-3082-0.
  15. Conti D, Ballo P, Boccalini R, et al. The effect of patient sex on the incidence of early adverse effects in a population of elderly patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014;42(4):455-459. doi:10.1177/0310057X1404200405.
  16. Sankar A, Johnson SR, Beattie WS, Tait G, Wijeysundera DN. Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(3):424-432. doi:10.1093/bja/aeu100.
  17. Kasanah NR, Induniasih B. Pengaruh kompres hangat di femoral terhadap waktu pencapaian bromage skor 2 pada spinal anestesi di rsu pku muhammadiyah bantul. Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Yogyakarta. 2019.
  18. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, Nindl BC. Recovery responses of testosterone, growth hormone, and IGF-1 after resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1985. 2017;122(3):549-558. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00599.2016.
  19. Chae KL, Park SY, Hong JI, Yim WJ, Lee SC, Chung CJ. The effect of gender and age on postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Anesth. Pain Med. 2019;(14). p364–369. https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.2019.14.3.364.
  20. Castro-Sánchez AM, Matarán-Peñarrocha GA, López-Rodríguez MM, Lara-Palomo IC, Arendt-Nielsen L, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Gender differences in pain severity, disability, depression, and widespread pressure pain sensitivity in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome without comorbid conditions. Pain Med. 2012;13(12):1639-1647. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01523.x.
  21. Chen M, Chen C, Ke Q. The effect of age on the median effective dose (ED50) of intrathecally administered plain bupivacaine for motor block. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(4):863-868. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000147.
  22. Sivaram A, Govardhani A, Varaprasad US. A comparative study of low dose Bupivacaine vs high dose Bupivacaine along with Fentanyl and Phenylephrine on Pregnant women undergoing elective Caesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia. Int. J. Med. Res. Rev. 2014;(2). https://doi.org/10.17511/ijmrr.2014.i02.10.
  23. Kararmaz, A., Kaya, S., Turhanoglu, S. and Ozyilmaz, M.A. Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anaesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy. Anaesthesia. 2003;(58). p526-530. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03153.x.
  24. Olofsson C, Nygårds EB, Bjersten AB, Hessling A. Low-dose bupivacaine with sufentanil prevents hypotension after spinal anesthesia for hip repair in elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48(10):1240-1244. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00504.x.
  25. Kotwani MB, Rupwate K, Shivananda P, Magar J. Comparison between high dose hyperbaric Bupivacaine (12.5 mg) alone versus low dose hyperbaric Bupivacaine (7.5 mg) with fentanyl (25 µg) in spinal anaesthesia for inguinal hernia surgery. Int. J. Clin. Trials. 2016;(3). p140. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20162795.
  26. Desai D, Bumiya P, Vashishtha A. Spinal anesthesia with low dose bupivacaine and fentanyl for femur surgeries in elderly patients. J. Anesth. Crit. Care. 2019;(11). p60–64. https://doi.org/10.15406/jaccoa.2019.11.00412.
  27. Ferrarezi WPP, Braga A, Ferreira VB, Mendes SQ. Bupivacaine associated with different doses of fentanyl: randomized clinical trial, Brazilian J. Anesthesiol. 2021;(71). p642–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.030.
  28. Thornton P, Hanumanthaiah D, O'Leary RA, Iohom G. Effects of fentanyl added to a mixture of intrathecal bupivacaine and morphine for spinal anaesthesia in elective caesearean section. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015;22(2):97-102.
  29. Mahendru V, Tewari A, Katyal S, Grewal A, Singh MR, Katyal R. A comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A double blind controlled study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29(4):496-502. doi:10.4103/0970-9185.119151.
  30. Gupta R, Verma R, Bogra J, Kohli M, Raman R, Kushwaha JK. A Comparative study of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to Bupivacaine. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011;27(3):339-343. doi:10.4103/0970-9185.83678.
  31. Dernedde M, Stadler M, Bardiau F, Boogaerts JG. Comparison of 2 concentrations of levobupivacaine in postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. J Clin Anesth. 2005;17(7):531-536. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.01.007.

How to Cite

Karnina, R., Rahayu, N. S., & Faruk, M. . (2022). Factors influencing Bromage score in post-spinal anesthesia patients. Bali Medical Journal, 11(3), 1146–1150. Retrieved from https://blog.balimedicaljournal.org/index.php/bmj/article/view/3435

HTML
0

Total
0

Share

Search Panel

Resiana Karnina
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Nandya Satyaning Rahayu
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Muhammad Faruk
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal