Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

A comparison of functional knee outcomes post-arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring and peroneus longus (PL) autograft

  • Muhammad Sakti ,
  • Jainal Arifin ,
  • Gerald Wonggokusuma ,
  • Ferdinand Arden ,
  • Muhammad Faidzin ,

Abstract

Background: Hamstring autograft (HA) is the most common graft used in ACL reconstruction procedures. However, harvesting HA could weaken the secondary stabilizer of the knee joint. Peroneus longus grafts (PL) is a novel option secondary to hamstring graft with less morbidity at the knee joint. We intended to determine whether peroneus longus autograft (PL) is a comparable alternative to hamstring autograft for ACL Reconstruction.

Methods: 84 patients were grouped into "hamstring" (n = 51) and "peroneus longus" (n = 33) groups, with a mean age of 26.2 ± 5.9 in the Hamstring group and a mean age of 26.4 ± 6.6 in peroneus group. We obtain secondary data from the medical records of several hospitals in Makassar.

Results: There was a significant difference in Lysholm score (p<0.05) in the hamstring group with peroneus at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively for IKDC score, anterior translation, Power Grading Flexi-Extension, ROM on flexion, and extension. In addition, in muscle atrophy, the Hamstring group compared to the peroneus group also showed a significant difference (p=0.001).

Conclusion: The study's results did not show significant differences between the hamstring and peroneus groups other than atrophy of thigh muscles in the hamstring group. Based on the results of this study, we conclude peroneus longus graft is one of the graft options in ACL reconstruction surgery.

References

  1. Abulhasan JF, Grey MJ. Anatomy and physiology of knee stability. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk2040034.
  2. Fujimaki Y, Thorhauer E, Sasaki Y, Smolinski P, Tashman S, Fu FH. Quantitative In Situ Analysis of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Length, Midsubstance Cross-sectional Area, and Insertion Site Areas. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(1):118-125. doi:10.1177/0363546515611641.
  3. Kumar KV, Narayanan SK, and Vishal RB. A study on peroneus longus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019. DOI:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20195904.
  4. Pontaga I. role of hamstring muscles in knee joint stability providing and injury prevention. Soc Integr Educ Proc Int Sci Conf. 2016. DOI:10.17770/SIE2016VOL3.1469.
  5. Fritsch B, Figueroa F, Semay B. Graft Preparation Technique to Optimize Hamstring Graft Diameter for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6(6):e2169-e2175. Published 2017 Nov 13. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.011.
  6. Papa JA. Clinical Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: An Evidence-Based Approach – Third Edition. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2012;56(3):234.
  7. Gulick DT. Reliability and Validity of an Innovative Device for ACL Testing: The Mobil-Aider™. J Sport Rehabil. 2020;29(2):257-261. doi:10.1123/jsr.2018-0472.
  8. Laupattarakasem W, Paholpak P, Kosuwon W. The relevant level to estimate girth difference between thighs after anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012;95 Suppl 10:S178-S183.
  9. Compston A. Aids to the investigation of peripheral nerve injuries. Medical Research Council: Nerve Injuries Research Committee. His Majesty's Stationery Office: 1942; pp. 48 (iii) and 74 figures and 7 diagrams; with aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. By Michael O'Brien for the Guarantors of Brain. Saunders Elsevier: 2010; pp. [8] 64 and 94 Figures. Brain. 2010;133(10):2838-2844. doi:10.1093/brain/awq270.
  10. Roaas A, Andersson GB. Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30-40 years of age. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53(2):205-208. doi:10.3109/17453678208992202.
  11. Rhatomy S, Asikin AIZ, Wardani AE, Rukmoyo T, Lumban-Gaol I, Budhiparama NC. Peroneus longus autograft can be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring tendon in single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(11):3552-3559. doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05455-w.
  12. Kerimoğlu S, Aynaci O, Saraçoğlu M, Aydin H, Turhan AU. Peroneus longus tendonu ile ön çapraz bağ rekonstrüksiyonu [Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneus longus tendon]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008;42(1):38-43. doi:10.3944/aott.2008.038.
  13. S Shi FD, Hess DE, Zuo JZ, et al. Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft is a Safe and Effective Alternative for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(8):804-811. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1669951.
  14. Xergia SA, McClelland JA, Kvist J, Vasiliadis HS, Georgoulis AD. The influence of graft choice on isokinetic muscle strength 4-24 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(5):768-780. doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1357-0.
  15. He J, Tang Q, Ernst S, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft has functional outcomes comparable to hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(9):2869-2879. doi:10.1007/s00167-020-06279-9.

How to Cite

Sakti, M., Arifin, J., Wonggokusuma, G., Arden, F., & Faidzin, M. (2022). A comparison of functional knee outcomes post-arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring and peroneus longus (PL) autograft. Bali Medical Journal, 11(2), 591–595. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v11i2.3233

HTML
0

Total
0

Share

Search Panel