Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Correlation between short-term heart rate variability and QT-Interval with left ventricular systolic function in patients with stable Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): a cross-sectional study

  • Agnes Lucia Panda ,
  • Natalia Christina Intania Polii ,
  • Victor Giovannie Xaverison Rooroh ,
  • Andreas Erick Haurissa ,
  • Agustinus Mahardhika Sarayar ,
  • Filipus Michael Yofrido ,


Background: The ischemic process in stable Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) causes cardiac remodeling and dysfunction, signaling the progress towards irreversible heart failure. Early identification for the presence of Left ventricular (LV) remodeling and dysfunction is important. Several methods can be used to assess LV dysfunction using echocardiography, including peak Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) and ejection fraction measurements. Short-term Heart Rate Variability (HRV) and QT interval are considered practical parameters in electrocardiography identifying LV dysfunction. This study aimed to determine the relationship between short-term HRV and QT interval with LV systolic function in stable angina pectoris patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital, Manado, from March to September 2021. All study subjects who met the inclusion criteria underwent a clinical history and further examinations, including electrocardiography, laboratory, and echocardiography examinations. The relationship of HRV variables and QT interval with LV systolic function were analyzed using Pearson correlation and linear regression models by SPSS version 21 for Windows.

Results: A total of 33 subjects were included with a mean age of 62.3±8.9 years. Non-parametric correlation analysis between HRV variables and left ventricular systolic function showed no significant correlation. There was a significant correlation between QTc interval by Fridericia and LV peak GLS, but not with ejection fraction (r=0.426; p=0.013). The univariate regression analysis showed a relationship between QTc interval by Bazett and Fridericia with peak GLS (Bazett B=0.036; ?=0.35; R2=0.122; p=0.046; Fridericia B=0.052; ?=0.426; R2=0.181; p=0.013).

Conclusion: There was a weak and moderate positive correlation between the QTc interval by Bazett and Fridericia formula with left ventricular systolic function. There was no statistically significant correlation between the short-term HRV variable and left ventricular systolic function.


  1. Hanson MA, Fareed MT, Argenio SL, Agunwamba AO, Hanson TR. Coronary artery disease. Prim Care. 2013;40(1):1-16.
  2. Ralapanawa U, Sivakanesan R. Epidemiology and the Magnitude of Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Narrative Review. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021;11(2):169-177.
  3. Kotecha D, New G, Flather MD, Eccleston D, Pepper J, Krum H. Five-minute heart rate variability can predict obstructive angiographic coronary disease. Heart. 2012;98(5):395-401.
  4. AlGhatrif M, Lindsay J. A brief review: history to understand fundamentals of electrocardiography. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2012;2(1):1-5.
  5. Zhang Y, Post WS, Blasco-Colmenares E, Dalal D, Tomaselli GF, Guallar E. Electrocardiographic QT interval and mortality: a meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2011;22(5):660-670.
  6. Davey P. QT interval and mortality from coronary artery disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2000;42(5):359-384.
  7. Vandenberk B, Vandael E, Robyns T, Vandenberghe J, Garweg C, Foulon V, et al. Which QT Correction Formulae to Use for QT Monitoring? J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(6):e003264.
  8. Radwan H, Hussein E. Value of global longitudinal strain by two dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in predicting coronary artery disease severity. Egypt Heart J. 2017;69(2):95-101.
  9. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996;17(3):354-381.
  10. Huikuri HV, Mäkikallio TH. Heart rate variability in ischemic heart disease. Auton Neurosci. 2001;90(1-2):95-101.
  11. Mironova T, Mironov V, Antufiev V, Safronova E, Mironov M, Davydova E. Heart rate variability analysis at coronary artery disease and angina pectoris. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov. 2009;4(1):45-54.
  12. Huikuri HV, Jokinen V, Syvänne M, et al. Heart rate variability and progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19(8):1979-1985.
  13. Y?lmaz M, Kayançiçek H, Çekic Y. Heart rate variability: Highlights from hidden signals. J Integr Cardiol. 2018;4(5):1-8.
  14. Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front Public Health. 2017;5:258.
  15. Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT Jr, Moss AJ. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59(4):256-262.
  16. Shehab A, Elnour AA, Struthers AD. Heart rate variability as an indicator of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2009;20(5):278-283.
  17. Tran N, Asad Z, Elkholey K, Scherlag BJ, Po SS, Stavrakis S. Autonomic Neuromodulation Acutely Ameliorates Left Ventricular Strain in Humans. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2019;12(3):221-230.
  18. Velavan P, Khan NK, Rigby AS, Goode K, Komajda M, Follath F, et al. Relation between severity of left ventricular systolic dysfunction and repolarisation abnormalities on the surface ECG: a report from the Euro heart failure survey. Heart. 2006;92(2):255-256.
  19. Davey P. QT interval lengthening in cardiac disease relates more to left ventricular systolic dysfunction than to autonomic function. Eur J Heart Fail. 2000;2(3):265-271.
  20. Padmanabhan S, Silvet H, Amin J, Pai RG. Prognostic value of QT interval and QT dispersion in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results from a cohort of 2265 patients with an ejection fraction of < or =40%. Am Heart J. 2003;145(1):132-138.
  21. Antoniou CK, Dilaveris P, Manolakou P, Galanakos S, Magkas N, Gatzoulis K, et al. QT Prolongation and Malignant Arrhythmia: How Serious a Problem? Eur Cardiol. 2017;12(2):112-120.
  22. Prabawa IPY, Lestari AAW, Muliarta IM, Mardhika PE, Pertiwi GAR, Bhargah A, et al. The Stromal Cell-derived Factor-1/ CXCL12 3’A-gene Polymorphism is Related to the Increased Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2020;8(F):197-202.

How to Cite

Panda, A. L., Polii, N. C. I., Rooroh, V. G. X., Haurissa, A. E., Sarayar, A. M., & Yofrido, F. M. (2021). Correlation between short-term heart rate variability and QT-Interval with left ventricular systolic function in patients with stable Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): a cross-sectional study. Bali Medical Journal, 10(3), 1026–1030.




Search Panel

Agnes Lucia Panda
Google Scholar
BMJ Journal

Natalia Christina Intania Polii
Google Scholar
BMJ Journal

Victor Giovannie Xaverison Rooroh
Google Scholar
BMJ Journal

Andreas Erick Haurissa
Google Scholar
BMJ Journal

Agustinus Mahardhika Sarayar
Google Scholar
BMJ Journal

Filipus Michael Yofrido
Google Scholar
BMJ Journal