Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

The effect of Indonesian propolis dosage on vascularization of skin graft in skin wound of white rat’s skin graft model: molecular studies of malondialdehyde (MDA), nuclear factor-kappa beta (NF-kB), interleukin-6, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF

  • Amru Sungkar ,
  • Muchsin Doewes ,
  • Bambang Purwanto ,
  • Brian Wasita ,

Abstract

Background: Extensive wound closure due to trauma, infection and post tumor excision often requires a skin graft procedure. One of the successful factors of skin graft is the good quality of recipient tissue vascularization. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a factor that plays a role in vascularization, an excessive accumulation of ROS can interfere with the process of vascularization. Administration of the antioxidant can keep the ROS levels from being excessive thus producing the recipient vascularization for a successful skin graft. Propolis has an effect of antioxidant, inflammation and immunomodulator, anti-ROS and anti-inflammatory effects due to the large polyphenol content. This study aims to examine the antioxidant effect of propolis ethanol extract Lawu mountain (EEP) in a rats skin graft model by examining its effect on oxidative stress levels (Malondialdehyde blood levels/MDA), effect on inflammation (IL-6 blood levels and NF-kB expression), effect on angiogenesis (VEGF blood levels and Caspase 3 expression) and skin graft vascularization (Micro Vessels Density /MVD).

Methods: The study used 24 white male rats (Rattus norvegicus) aged 3-4 months, body weight 150-300 grams, and divided into a control group with skin graft without treatment and three groups of skin graft treated with a dosage, 200 mg/kg-BW EEP, a dosage, 400 mg/kg-BW EEP, dan a dosage, 800 mg/kgBW EEP) for 7 days. Wound tissue granulation is made according to previous research. Skin graft procedure uses allograft donors for 7 days. Blood draw from retro orbita veins and skin graft with a small amount of recipient tissue done after the seventh day. The propolis ethanol extract of mount Lawu (EEP) is made by maceration technique 3,75 liters of ethanol 70% as a solvent. Using the SPSS 22 for windows program, blood MDA levels, blood IL-6 levels, and blood VEGF levels were analyzed by One Way ANOVA and post hoc. Examination of Nuclear Factor-Kappa Beta (NF-kB) expression, Caspase-3 expression, and MVD was carried out by using Immunohistochemistry (IHC) tested with non-parametric Mann-Whitney test.

Results: There was a significant decrease in MDA blood levels (p<0.05), with an effective dosage, 400 mg/kgBW EEP and a dosage, 800 mg/kg-BW EEP. There was a significant decrease of IL-6 blood levels (p<0.05) at administration dosage, 200 mg/kg-BW EEP and a dosage, 400 mg/kg-BW EEP, and statistically significant (p<0.05). Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) blood levels increased with a dosage from 200 mg/kg-BW EEP until a dosage, 800 mg/kgBW EEP and significant (p<0.05), the post hoc test showed significant results in all group comparisons. There was no significant increase of skin graft vascularization (MVD) (p=0.254). Caspase-3 and NF-kB expressions decreased at certain dosages, although the decrease of Caspase-3 (p=0.557) and NF-kB (p=0.916) were not significant in statistic analysis test.

Conclusion: Propolis ethanol extract of mount Lawu (EEP) has anti-ROS, anti-inflammatory, and angiogenic effect through decreased MDA blood levels, decreased IL-6 blood levels and increased VEGF blood levels, no significant reduction in NF-kB and caspase-3 expression and there was no increase in skin graft vascularization (MVD). 

References

  1. McDermott KW, Weiss AJ, Elixhauser A. Burn-Related Hospital Inpatient Stays and Emergency Department Visits, 2013: Statistical Brief #217. 2016 Dec. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Feb–. PMID: 28121115.
  2. Kanapathy M, Smith OJ, Hachach-Haram N, Bystrzonowski N, Mosahebi A, Richards T. Protocol for a systematic review of the efficacy of epidermal grafting for wound healing. Syst Rev. 2016;5:92. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0268-7.
  3. Serebrakian AT, Pickrell BB, Varon DE, Mohamadi A, Grinstaff MW, Rodriguez EK, Nazarian A, Halvorson EG, Sinha I. Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Skin Graft Donor-site Dressings with Future Guidelines. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(9):e1928. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001928.
  4. Santema TB, Poyck PP, Ubbink DT. Skin grafting and tissue replacement for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD011255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011255.pub2.
  5. Hallock GG, Morris SF. Skin grafts and local flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(1):5e-22e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fad46c.
  6. Wollina U, Meseg A, Weber A. Use of a collagen-elastin matrix for hard to treat soft tissue defects. Int Wound J. 2011;8(3):291-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00785.x.
  7. Thorne CH, et al. Grabb and Smith's plastic surgery: Seventh edition. Wolters Kluwer Health Adis (ESP). 2013; pp: 68.
  8. Frueh FS, Sanchez-Macedo N, Calcagni M, Giovanoli P, Lindenblatt N. The Crucial Role of Vascularization and Lymphangiogenesis in Skin Reconstruction. Eur Surg Res. 2018;59(3-4):242-254. doi: 10.1159/000492413.
  9. Wu X, Kathuria N, Patrick CW, Reece GP. Quantitative analysis of the microvasculature growing in the fibrin interface between a skin graft and the recipient site. Microvasc Res. 2008;75(1):119-29. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2007.04.012.
  10. Gould DJ, Reece GP. Skin graft vascular maturation and remodeling: a multifractal approach to morphological quantification. Microcirculation. 2012;19(7):652-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2012.00200.x.
  11. Reddy S, El-Haddawi F, Fancourt M, Farrant G, Gilkison W, Henderson N, Kyle S, Mosquera D. The incidence and risk factors for lower limb skin graft failure. Dermatol Res Pract. 2014;2014:582080. doi: 10.1155/2014/582080.
  12. Yammine K, Assi C. A Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Split-Thickness Skin Graft on Diabetic Leg and Foot Ulcers. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019;18(1):23-30. doi: 10.1177/1534734619832123.
  13. Kim YW, Byzova TV. Oxidative stress in angiogenesis and vascular disease. Blood. 2014;123(5):625-31. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-09-512749.
  14. Honnegowda TM, Kumar P, Udupa EGP, Kumar S, Kumar U, Rao P. Role of angiogenesis and angiogenic factors in acute and chronic wound healing. Plast Aesthet Res. 2015;2:243-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2347-9264.165438
  15. Frisca S, Sardjono CT, Sandra F. Angiogenesis: pathophysiology and clinical application. Public Health J. 2009;8(2):174-187.
  16. Bösmüller H, Pfefferle V, Bittar Z, Scheble V, Horger M, Sipos B, Fend F. Microvessel density and angiogenesis in primary hepatic malignancies: Differential expression of CD31 and VEGFR-2 in hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2018;214(8):1136-1141. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2018.06.011.
  17. Apte RS, Chen DS, Ferrara N. VEGF in Signaling and Disease: Beyond Discovery and Development. Cell. 2019;176(6):1248-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.021.
  18. Sawicka D, Car H, Borawska MH, Nikli?ski J. The anticancer activity of propolis. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2012;50(1):25-37. doi: 10.2478/18693.
  19. Pasupuleti VR, Sammugam L, Ramesh N, Gan SH. Honey, Propolis, and Royal Jelly: A Comprehensive Review of Their Biological Actions and Health Benefits. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:1259510. doi: 10.1155/2017/1259510.
  20. Sarsono S. Identification of caffeic acid phenyl esther in the ethanol extract of propolis isolate Mount Lawu. JBAI. 2012;8(2):132-6
  21. Ummanni R, Lehnigk U, Zimmermann U, Woenckhaus C, Walther R, Giebel J. Immunohistochemical expression of caspase-1 and-9, uncleaved caspase-3 and -6, cleaved caspase-3 and -6 as well as bcl-2 in benign epithelium and cancer of the prostate. Exp Ther Med. 2010;1:47–52.
  22. Park S, Tepper OM, Galiano RD, Capla JM, Baharestani S, Kleinman ME, Pelo CR, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Selective recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells to ischemic tissues with increased neovascularization. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(1):284-93. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000091169.51035.A5.
  23. Mogo?anu GD, Popescu FC, Busuioc CJ, Lasc?r I, Mogoant? L. Comparative study of microvascular density in experimental third-degree skin burns treated with topical preparations containing herbal extracts. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2013;54(1):107-13.
  24. Cano Sanchez M, Lancel S, Boulanger E, Neviere R. Targeting Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Treatment of Impaired Wound Healing: A Systematic Review. Antioxidants (Basel). 2018;7(8):98. doi: 10.3390/antiox7080098.
  25. Broughton G 2nd, Janis JE, Attinger CE. The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(7 Suppl):12S-34S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000225430.42531.c2.
  26. Kurahashi T, Fujii J. Roles of Antioxidative Enzymes in Wound Healing. Journal of Developmental Biology. 2015;3(2):57-70. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb3020057
  27. Mahmoud AM, Abd El-Twab SM. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester protects the brain against hexavalent chromium toxicity by enhancing endogenous antioxidants and modulating the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;91:303-311. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.04.073.
  28. Barros Silva R, Santos NA, Martins NM, Ferreira DA, Barbosa F Jr, Oliveira Souza VC, Kinoshita A, Baffa O, Del-Bel E, Santos AC. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester protects against the dopaminergic neuronal loss induced by 6-hydroxydopamine in rats. Neuroscience. 2013;233:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.041.
  29. Nanaware S, Shelar M, Sinnathambi A, Mahadik KR, Lohidasan S. Neuroprotective effect of Indian propolis in ?-amyloid induced memory deficit: Impact on behavioral and biochemical parameters in rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;93:543-553. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.06.072.
  30. Alyane M, Kebsa LB, Boussenane H, Rouibah H, Lahouel M. Cardioprotective effects and mechanism of action of polyphenols extracted from propolis against doxorubicin toxicity. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2008;21(3):201-9.
  31. Prasetyo AP, Hestianah E, Handijatno D. Protective Effect of propolis extract on Histyopathological Features of Mice’s (Mus Musculus ) Liver induced by Lead Acetate. Journal of Basic Medicine Veterenary. 2017;6(2):91-99.
  32. Redhono D, Purwanto B, Wasita B, Indarto D, Adji RS, Kusumawardani A, Cilmiaty R. The Antioxidant Effect of Indonesian Propolis In Rats Induced by Anthrax Spores. SRP. 2021;12(1):557-562. doi:10.31838/srp.2021.1.80
  33. Askari VR, Rahimi VB, Zamani P, Fereydouni N, Rahmanian-Devin P, Sahebkar AH, Rakhshandeh H. Evaluation of the effects of Iranian propolis on the severity of post operational-induced peritoneal adhesion in rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;99:346-353. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.01.068.
  34. Corrêa FR, Schanuel FS, Moura-Nunes N, Monte-Alto-Costa A, Daleprane JB. Brazilian red propolis improves cutaneous wound healing suppressing inflammation-associated transcription factor NF?B. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;86:162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.12.018.
  35. Funakoshi-Tago M, Ohsawa K, Ishikawa T, Nakamura F, Ueda F, Narukawa Y, Kiuchi F, Tamura H, Tago K, Kasahara T. Inhibitory effects of flavonoids extracted from Nepalese propolis on the LPS signaling pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2016;40:550-560. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.10.008.
  36. Xuan H, Li Z, Yan H, Sang Q, Wang K, He Q, Wang Y, Hu F. Antitumor Activity of Chinese Propolis in Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 Cells. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:280120. doi: 10.1155/2014/280120.
  37. Kondo T, Ishida Y. Molecular pathology of wound healing. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;203(1-3):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.07.004.
  38. Bao P, Kodra A, Tomic-Canic M, Golinko MS, Ehrlich HP, Brem H. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in wound healing. J Surg Res. 2009;153(2):347-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.04.023.
  39. Paeng SH, Jung WK, Park WS, Lee DS, Kim GY, Choi YH, Seo SK, Jang WH, Choi JS, Lee YM, Park S, Choi IW. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester reduces the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor through the inhibition of the ROS, PI3K and HIF-1? signaling pathways in human retinal pigment epithelial cells under hypoxic conditions. Int J Mol Med. 2015;35(5):1419-26. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2116.
  40. Tanaka M, Kanazashi M, Maeshige N, Kondo H, Ishihara A, Fujino H. Protective effects of Brazilian propolis supplementation on capillary regression in the soleus muscle of hindlimb-unloaded rats. J Physiol Sci. 2019;69(2):223-233. doi: 10.1007/s12576-018-0639-z.
  41. Iqbal M, Fan TP, Watson D, Alenezi S, Saleh K, Sahlan M. Preliminary studies: the potential anti-angiogenic activities of two Sulawesi Island (Indonesia) propolis and their chemical characterization. Heliyon. 2019;5(7):e01978. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01978.
  42. McIlwain DR, Berger T, Mak TW. Caspase functions in cell death and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Apr 1;5(4):a008656. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008656. Erratum in: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(4). pii: a026716. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026716.
  43. Redza-Dutordoir M, Averill-Bates DA. Activation of apoptosis signalling pathways by reactive oxygen species. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1863(12):2977-2992. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.09.012.
  44. Aksu EH, Özkaraca M, Kandemir FM, Ömür AD, Eldutar E, Küçükler S, Çomakl? S. Mitigation of paracetamol-induced reproductive damage by chrysin in male rats via reducing oxidative stress. Andrologia. 2016;48(10):1145-1154. doi: 10.1111/and.12553.
  45. Capla JM, Ceradini DJ, Tepper OM, Callaghan MJ, Bhatt KA, Galiano RD, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Skin graft vascularization involves precisely regulated regression and replacement of endothelial cells through both angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(3):836-44. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000201459.91559.7f.
  46. Duff SE, Jeziorska M, Kumar S, Haboubi N, Sherlock D, O'Dwyer ST, Jayson GC. Lymphatic vessel density, microvessel density and lymphangiogenic growth factor expression in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(9):793-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01199.x.
  47. Uehara M, Li X, Sheikhi A, et al. Anti-IL-6 eluting immunomodulatory biomaterials prolong skin allograft survival. Sci Rep. 2019;9:6535. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42349-w
  48. Liang Y, Christopher K, Finn PW, Colson YL, Perkins DL. Graft produced interleukin-6 functions as a danger signal and promotes rejection after transplantation. Transplantation. 2007;84(6):771-7. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000281384.24333.0b.

How to Cite

Sungkar, A., Doewes, M., Purwanto, B., & Wasita, B. (2021). The effect of Indonesian propolis dosage on vascularization of skin graft in skin wound of white rat’s skin graft model: molecular studies of malondialdehyde (MDA), nuclear factor-kappa beta (NF-kB), interleukin-6, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF. Bali Medical Journal, 10(2), 811–820. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v10i2.2339

HTML
13

Total
15

Share

Search Panel