Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

The effect of bioabsorbable (fibrillar) and fibrin glue on the number of macrophages and fibroblasts in Wistar rats with gastric perforation compared to the omental patch method

Abstract

 

Background: Gastric perforation covers 25-30% of acute abdomen in the ER and has high mortality and morbidity rate. Surgery is the primary treatment of gastric perforation. The omental patch is commonly used to close the gastric perforation. One method is to use bioabsorbable material glued with fibrin glue. This study aims to determine the effect of bioabsorbable material as a sutureless technique in wound healing of gastric perforation.

Method: A true laboratory experimental post-test only control group design using a single-blind technique was conducted among 20 Wistar rats. They were divided into 2 random groups, 10 fibrillar and fibrin glue group and 10 omental patch group. Perforation was made by forming a small hole with a diameter of 0.5 cm using a punch biopsy. The microscopic examination with Hematoxylin-eosin staining was carried out for the number of macrophages and fibroblasts from the gastric perforation site. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 for Windows.

Result: The average number of fibroblasts produced by the fibrillar and fibrin glue group was 7.5 and 5.4 in omental patch group. Based on the result of  T-test (fibroblasts), it was obtained that there was a significant difference (H1 is accepted) in the number of fibroblasts produced using fibrillar and fibrin glue compared to the omental patch method (P<0.001). The average number of macrophages in fibrillar and fibrin glue group was 4 and 3 in omental patch group. Based on T-test, it was found a significant difference in the number of macrophages produced using fibrillar and fibrin glue compared to the omental patch method (P<0.05)

Conclusion: The administration of fibrillar and fibrin glue biomaterials in the closure of gastric perforation increased the number of macrophages and fibroblast cells better than the omental patch method.

References

  1. Gossman W, Tuma F, Kamel BG, Cassaro S. Gastric Perforation. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019. [Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519554/] [Accessed: July 10th 2019]
  2. Søreide K, Thorsen K, Harrison EM, Bingener J, Møller MH, Ohene-Yeboah M, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1288-1298.
  3. Unver M, Fırat Ö, Ünalp ÖV, Uğuz A, Gümüş T, Sezer TÖ, et al. Prognostic factors in peptic ulcer perforations: a retrospective 14-year study. Int Surg. 2015;100(5):942-8.
  4. Lui FY, Davis KA.. Gastroduodenal perforation: maximal or minimal intervention? Scand J Surg. 2010;99(2):73-7.
  5. Goldstein JL, Cryer B. Gastrointestinal injury associated with NSAID use: a case study and review of risk factors and preventative strategy. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2015;7:31-41.
  6. Di Saverio S, Bassi M, Smerieri N, Masetti M, Ferrara F, Fabbri C, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of perforated or Bleeding peptic ulcers WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9:45.
  7. Bertleff MJ, Stegmann T, Liem RS, Kors G, Robinson PH, Nicolai JP, et al. Comparison of closure of gastric perforation ulcers with biodegradable lactide-glycolide-caprolactone or omental patches. JSLS. 2009;13(4):550-4.
  8. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer. JSLS. 2013;17(1):15-22.
  9. Grinnell F, Ho CH, Tamariz E, Lee DJ, Skuta G. Dendritic fibroblasts in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Feb;14(2):384-95.
  10. Koh TJ, DiPietro LA. Inflammation and wound healing: the role of the macrophage. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2011;13:e23.
  11. Krzyszczyk P, Schloss R, Palmer A, Berthiaume F. The Role of Macrophages in Acute and Chronic Wound Healing and Interventions to Promote Pro-wound Healing Phenotypes. Front Physiol. 2018;9:419.
  12. Sheikh Z, Brooks PJ, Barzilay O, Fine N, Glogauer M. Macrophages, Foreign Body Giant Cells and Their Response to Implantable Biomaterials. Materials (Basel). 2015;8(9):5671-5701.
  13. Vij N, Sharma A, Thakkar M, Sinha S, Mohan RR. PDGF-driven proliferation, migration,and IL8 chemokine secretion in human corneal fibroblasts involve JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1020-7.
  14. Gonzalez AC, Costa TF, Andrade ZA, Medrado AR. Wound healing - A literature review. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91(5):614-620.
  15. Konturek SJ, Brzozowski T, Majka I, Pawlik W, Stachura J. Omentum and basic fibroblast growth factor in healing of chronic gastric ulcerations in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 1994;39(5):1064-71.
  16. Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res. 2009;37(5):1528-42.
  17. Akita S, Akino K, Hirano A. Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Scarless Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013;2(2):44-49.
  18. Kim JH, Ahn HD, Kwon KA, Kim YJ, Chung JW, et al. Spontaneous healing of gastric perforation after endoscopic ligation for gastric varices. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(4):624-7.

How to Cite

Resdiyanto, R., Niam, M. S., Rasyid, H. A., Sugiharto, S., Inggarwati, L., & Susilo, H. (2019). The effect of bioabsorbable (fibrillar) and fibrin glue on the number of macrophages and fibroblasts in Wistar rats with gastric perforation compared to the omental patch method. Bali Medical Journal, 8(3), S799-S802. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v8i3.1561

HTML
0

Total
1

Share

Search Panel

Resdiyanto Resdiyanto
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Muhammad Shobachun Niam
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Harun Al Rasyid
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Setyo Sugiharto
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Lulik Inggarwati
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal


Hery Susilo
Google Scholar
Pubmed
BMJ Journal